Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mauricio Biazzi
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:58, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mauricio Biazzi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability, doesn't appear to meet WP:MUSIC or the GNG. There's some level of WP:V present, 4 hits in Google news reflect passing mentions in lists of musicians within articles, but none are "signficant" coverage, no secondary independent coverage I could find in Books or Web either. Unsourced for over two years. j⚛e deckertalk 19:07, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Non-notable musician. No significant coverage. Christopher Connor (talk) 01:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.